REVERSE IT NOW! End Mortgage Payments!

June 5, 2008

Cashing In On Your Home, U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT

Filed under: HUD/FHA: Reverse Mortgage for Seniors — gloriaboone @ 9:07 pm

Cashing In On Your Home

It’s no surprise that reverse mortgages are becoming popular among seniors

By Leonard Wiener
Posted 6/5/05

For many of today’s retirees, a home can seem like Fort Knox without the key. Escalating real-estate prices have caused many seniors’ homes to skyrocket in value. But unless they’re willing to sell, it may be an inaccessible gain during a time in their lives when extra income and liquid assets would be most welcome. There is a way to tap those profits–a reverse mortgage. “Many seniors are sitting on home equity they never dreamed of,” says realty expert Tom Kelly, whose recent book, The New Reverse Mortgage Formula, is a guide to what a growing number of elderly homeowners see as a way to have their home and cash in on it, too.

A reverse mortgage allows a homeowner to borrow against the equity in a home, but unlike a home-equity loan, the loan and interest do not have to be repaid until the home is sold. The loan might be in the form of a line of credit that can increase over time and be drawn on as needed, a lump sum payout, a fixed monthly check for as long as you live in the home, or a mix of options.

There is minimal or no upfront cost, as closing and other fees can be wrapped into the loan. The reverse mortgage also pays off any existing mortgage, ending that monthly bite on income. Cleo Dunn, an 88-year-old widow in Leawood, Kan., says the $1,200 a month she receives from her reverse mortgage supplements her Social Security check. That helps her pay medical and other bills while remaining in the home she loves. “I have this most beautiful garden,” she says. “I have a life here I could not have anyplace else.”


Reverse mortgages have been around for years, but it wasn’t until the early ’90s that they began earning respectability after the Federal Housing Administration started insuring the mortgages for repayment to lenders. Even so, they’ve been a niche product; only about40,000 were done last year. But an aging population is expected to begin tapping into home equity more aggressively. New loans have doubled since 2003. Interest rates on reverse mortgages are mostly about 5.3 percent now but can also be about 6.5 or 8.5 percent, depending on the type and size of the loan.


Bolstering demand are seniors who see the loans not as a lifeline but as a route to a more active life. Francisco and Joanne Santana-Montez of Antelope, Calif., 69 and 68, will use their reverse mortgage line of credit to finance a dream trip to Cancun, Mexico. “Our adviser told us we’re spending our kids’ inheritance, but our children are delighted,” says Joanne.

A prime consideration when getting a reverse mortgage: age. The older you–and a spouse–are, the more cash you can get since the loan will presumably be shorter in duration. A 75-year-old with a fully paid-off $250,000 home in suburban Cleveland, for example, might receive about $917 a month. Or, as is more popular these days, the homeowner would qualify for a line of credit of about $140,000. A 70-year-old Clevelander would nail down less, about $791 a month or a $130,000 line of credit; an 80-year-old would draw more, a monthly check of about $1,099 or a $152,000 line of credit.

Cashing In On Your Home, U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT

Filed under: HUD/FHA: Reverse Mortgage for Seniors — gloriaboone @ 4:36 pm

Cashing In On Your Home

It’s no surprise that reverse mortgages are becoming popular among seniors

By Leonard Wiener
Posted 6/5/05

For many of today’s retirees, a home can seem like Fort Knox without the key. Escalating real-estate prices have caused many seniors’ homes to skyrocket in value. But unless they’re willing to sell, it may be an inaccessible gain during a time in their lives when extra income and liquid assets would be most welcome. There is a way to tap those profits–a reverse mortgage. “Many seniors are sitting on home equity they never dreamed of,” says realty expert Tom Kelly, whose recent book, The New Reverse Mortgage Formula, is a guide to what a growing number of elderly homeowners see as a way to have their home and cash in on it, too.

A reverse mortgage allows a homeowner to borrow against the equity in a home, but unlike a home-equity loan, the loan and interest do not have to be repaid until the home is sold. The loan might be in the form of a line of credit that can increase over time and be drawn on as needed, a lump sum payout, a fixed monthly check for as long as you live in the home, or a mix of options.

There is minimal or no upfront cost, as closing and other fees can be wrapped into the loan. The reverse mortgage also pays off any existing mortgage, ending that monthly bite on income. Cleo Dunn, an 88-year-old widow in Leawood, Kan., says the $1,200 a month she receives from her reverse mortgage supplements her Social Security check. That helps her pay medical and other bills while remaining in the home she loves. “I have this most beautiful garden,” she says. “I have a life here I could not have anyplace else.”


Reverse mortgages have been around for years, but it wasn’t until the early ’90s that they began earning respectability after the Federal Housing Administration started insuring the mortgages for repayment to lenders. Even so, they’ve been a niche product; only about40,000 were done last year. But an aging population is expected to begin tapping into home equity more aggressively. New loans have doubled since 2003. Interest rates on reverse mortgages are mostly about 5.3 percent now but can also be about 6.5 or 8.5 percent, depending on the type and size of the loan.


Bolstering demand are seniors who see the loans not as a lifeline but as a route to a more active life. Francisco and Joanne Santana-Montez of Antelope, Calif., 69 and 68, will use their reverse mortgage line of credit to finance a dream trip to Cancun, Mexico. “Our adviser told us we’re spending our kids’ inheritance, but our children are delighted,” says Joanne.

A prime consideration when getting a reverse mortgage: age. The older you–and a spouse–are, the more cash you can get since the loan will presumably be shorter in duration. A 75-year-old with a fully paid-off $250,000 home in suburban Cleveland, for example, might receive about $917 a month. Or, as is more popular these days, the homeowner would qualify for a line of credit of about $140,000. A 70-year-old Clevelander would nail down less, about $791 a month or a $130,000 line of credit; an 80-year-old would draw more, a monthly check of about $1,099 or a $152,000 line of credit.

Ed McMahon Losing Home to Foreclosure

Filed under: HUD/FHA: Reverse Mortgage for Seniors — gloriaboone @ 4:15 pm

85 Year Old Former Johnny Carson Sidekick May Lose Home
By CHRISTY LEMIRE, AP Entertainment Writer

Wed Jun 4, 8:24 PM ET

For years, Ed McMahon promised wealth, comfort and happiness as a pitchman for the American Family Publishers’ sweepstakes. Now, he could use some of that cash himself.
The former sidekick to Johnny Carson on the “Tonight” show is in danger of losing his multimillion-dollar Beverly Hills home to foreclosure.

Documents show that McMahon is nearly $644,000 behind in payments on a $4.8 million mortgage loan he got in 2005. Countrywide Home Loans Inc. filed the notice of default on Feb. 28, with the amount owed to “increase until your account becomes current,” according to documents obtained by Celebtv.com.

As of Wednesday afternoon, McMahon’s Mediterranean-styled house was still in the process of foreclosure; the bank hasn’t taken it over yet and no trustee sale date has been set. McMahon and his wife, Pamela, are having “very fruitful discussions” with the lender to resolve the problem, spokesman Howard Bragman said Wednesday.

Bragman declined to give specifics about McMahon’s finances, but said the 85-year-old television personality has been unable to work since he broke his neck 18 months ago. He did say that the current problems are unrelated to a toxic mold that spread through the structure, sickened McMahon and his wife, and led to the death of their dog in 2001. He received a $7.2 million settlement from that case.

The former “Star Search” host has found himself in the same situation so many homeowners have recently, said Daren Blomquist, spokesman for RealtyTrac, which follows foreclosure filings.

He found that McMahon has taken out several loans on the house over the past few years, including a $300,000 home equity line of credit the same day he took out the $4.8 million loan in November 2005.

“You’re using your house as a piggy bank because there’s so much equity — at least back in 2005 — so you’re able to take money out of it and use that for just spending in any way you see fit,” Blomquist said. “But the problem with that in the long term is that with the housing in this market, you don’t see it continue to go up in property value. Now, you see it going down in many areas … and you still have to pay your mortgage payments. You don’t have the option to take more cash out of the house.”

Bragman said there was “a certain irony” in the fact that McMahon has always tried to connect with average Americans, and now he’s experiencing some of their same problems.
“The part that really is touching, as Ed has said to me, is that, `I know I’m not alone in this. There’s a lot of working-class Americans who are getting caught up in this situation, and my heart goes out to them.’”

He first bought the six-bedroom, five-bathroom, 7,000-square-foot house in January 1990; the purchase price wasn’t mentioned in court documents. It’s been on the market for the past two years and is listed at $6.25 million. The mansion is in a gated hilltop section off Mulholland Drive called The Summit, the same exclusive area where Britney Spears lives.
Photos of the estate, posted on the Hilton & Hyland realty Web site, show an imposing stone facade with a large driveway, a sweeping staircase and a large pool in the back. The listing boasts, “The master suite, with his and hers baths and closets, overlooks the yard and sweeping canyon.”

McMahon is the latest celebrity to be hit by Southern California’s foreclosure crisis. In May, former baseball star and “Juiced” author Jose Canseco had his property foreclosed in the San Fernando Valley. Canseco said then that he walked away from his $2.5 million, 7,300-square-foot home in suburban Encino because it didn’t make sense to continue making payments.
Bragman said McMahon and his wife still live in their home and plan to remain there as long as possible: “He’s a pretty proud man. I don’t see him calling people and saying, ‘Send money.’

We’re not going to do a telethon for Ed.”
___
AP Entertainment Writer Derrik J. Lang contributed to this report.

Blog at WordPress.com.