REVERSE IT NOW! End Mortgage Payments!

May 21, 2008

A Reverse Mortgage = Senior Home Improvements

Filed under: HUD/FHA: Reverse Mortgage for Seniors — Tags: , , , , , , — gloriaboone @ 5:25 pm

 

                 

Seniors Finance Home Modifications with Reverse Mortgages               


Articles / dBNews Orange County
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 03:27:59

With the arrival of summer many senior adults prepare to make home modifications to make their home more accessible and safe so they may stay in their home and live independently. Being able to finance these important home modifications can be a real problem, however, there are a number of options available to senior homeowners including the government-insured reverse mortgage.

According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), remodelers have seen a 75 percent increase in requests for aging-in-place work. The aging population is one of the top issues to affect the remodeling industry over the next five years.

Senior homeowners overwhelmingly prefer to age in place: 89 percent according to AARP. Over 60% of seniors live in homes more than 20 years old. To age-in-place a home may need to be modified to make it easier and safer to carry out daily activities such as bathing, cooking, and climbing stairs.

Home modifications can help prevent accidents such as falls. One-third to one-half of home accidents can be prevented by modification and repair.

These modifications range from the installation of bath and shower grab bars and adjustment of countertop heights to the creation of multifunctional first-floor master suites and the installation of private elevators.

Selecting a remodeling contractor can turn into a nightmare, and with every spring there is an increase of home-repair fraud, especially among senior adults.

NAHB is a great source to start for information and help in selecting a reputable home remodeler. You may also want to consider a Certified Aging-in-Place Specialist (CAPS) who has been trained in the unique needs of the older homeowner. NAHB may be contacted at 800-368-5242 or by visiting their website at www.nahb.org.

Other sources for information on home remodeling include your local home builder’s association, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Better Business Bureau.

Many senior homeowners who need to make home modifications are unable to afford them. NAHB estimates that 80 percent of home modifications and repairs are funded from personal savings. Other options include a second mortgage, insurance coverage, federal and state programs, and foundations and organizations.

Area Agencies on Aging can direct senior homeowners to programs that may be available in their area to fund or make home modifications. To find your local Area Agency on Aging, call 800-677-1116 or visit their website at www.n4a.org.

According to a recent survey conducted by AARP, 46 percent of senior adults considering a reverse mortgage were for the purpose of paying for home modifications and improvements.

A reverse mortgage enables homeowners 62 and older to borrow against their home with no required repayment for as long as they live in their home. Credit and income are not used in qualifying for the reverse mortgage, and closing costs are typically financed, so there is usually no money out of pocket. Plus, a reverse mortgage does not affect Social Security or Medicare Benefits.

“A reverse mortgage is ideal for financing the cost of home improvements and repairs because of the flexibility in structuring how funds are received,” Kent Kopen, Reverse Mortgage Specialist at 1st Metropolitan Mortgage® said. “Seniors may receive a lump sum, a line of credit to draw from when needed, monthly payments, or a combination of these options.”

As the season turns from winter to summer, senior adults need to get started making home modifications and improvements that will keep them safe, comfortable and independent in their home for the rest of their lives.

 

Housing Accord: Senate Draws Near (Must still meet with House)

Filed under: HUD/FHA: Reverse Mortgage for Seniors — gloriaboone @ 12:57 pm

 
Might there be a housing rescue bill after all?
Monday night Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT and Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs announced that they had reached an agreement that will be presented to the whole committee on Tuesday.President George Bush has repeatedly said he would veto earlier versions of the bill, including one passed by the entire House, because they would involve the use of taxpayer money and would bail out lenders and speculators.         

Dodd and Shelby think that their compromises to “The Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008″ has eliminated those problems and the Administration said it was willing to consider the Senate version which shifts the burden of financing to the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
The new compromise legislation would create an affordable housing fund, financed by Freddie and Fannie which would be used in year one to provide about $500 million for foreclosure relief.
Like the House version of the bill which passed the whole House earlier, the Senate bill includes a provision authorizing the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee fixed-rate 30-year loans after lenders had reworked them to lower the principal balance to reflect current housing prices.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the effort would result in remediation of about one-half million mortgages over five year at a cost to taxpayers of $2.7 billion. By reducing the time-frame of the legislation to three years and taking money from the housing fund, the cost to taxpayers is expected to be eliminated.
The fund would collect a subsidy of one-half cent on every dollar of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and would tighten regulation of the two GSEs by creating a new Federal Housing Agency which would oversee the companies.
 
The bill would also set a new limit on conforming loans of $550,000 in the most expensive markets. The current conforming loan limit is $417,000 but there were patchwork exceptions to this – with some loans for as much as $729,250 authorized in very expensive markets – in legislation passed earlier this year.
Those emergency limits are set to expire at the end of the year.
“This legislation is good news for both the markets and homeowners,” said Dodd. “The bill addresses the root of our current economic problems – the foreclosure crisis – by creating a voluntary initiative at no estimated cost to taxpayers which will help Americans keep their homes.
 
The bill also establishes a new fund that will help create more affordable housing for millions for Americans.
Finally, this legislation takes a balanced approach toward reforming the GSEs, creating a world class regulator with enough authority to help these vital institutions operate in a safe and sound manner, while better fulfilling their important mission of providing affordable housing for Americans.”
Senator Shelby, a strong proponent of GSE reform, said, “In my judgment, the new GSE regulator created under this legislation would be granted much needed authority and flexibility to regulate the GSEs appropriately.
 
Ultimately, a strong regulator will better serve the interests of homeowners and taxpayers for years to come. I’m also pleased that the Hope for Homeowners proposal is paid for. I’ve long said that we should do what we can to help struggling homeowners, short of asking the taxpayer to foot the bill”.
——————————————————–
Story Information
Title: Senate Nears Accord on its Version of Housing Rescue Bill
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:54:45 EST
 

 

 

 

May 20, 2008

HOUSING BILL GROWS CLOSER

Filed under: News: 5-20-2008 Housing Bill Grows Closer — gloriaboone @ 5:57 pm



Senate Nears Accord on its Version of Housing Rescue Bill

_uacct = “UA-4394842-1″;
urchinTracker();

Might there be a housing rescue bill after all?

Monday night Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT and Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs announced that they had reached an agreement that will be presented to the whole committee on Tuesday.

President George Bush has repeatedly said he would veto earlier versions of the bill, including one passed by the entire House, because they would involve the use of taxpayer money and would bail out lenders and speculators.

Dodd and Shelby think that their compromises to “The Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008″ has eliminated those problems and the Administration said it was willing to consider the Senate version which shifts the burden of financing to the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

The new compromise legislation would create an affordable housing fund, financed by Freddie and Fannie which would be used in year one to provide about $500 million for foreclosure relief.

Like the House version of the bill which passed the whole House earlier, the Senate bill includes a provision authorizing the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee fixed-rate 30-year loans after lenders had reworked them to lower the principal balance to reflect current housing prices.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the effort would result in remediation of about one-half million mortgages over five year at a cost to taxpayers of $2.7 billion. By reducing the time-frame of the legislation to three years and taking money from the housing fund, the cost to taxpayers is expected to be eliminated.

The fund would collect a subsidy of one-half cent on every dollar of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and would tighten regulation of the two GSEs by creating a new Federal Housing Agency which would oversee the companies.

The bill would also set a new limit on conforming loans of $550,000 in the most expensive markets. The current conforming loan limit is $417,000 but there were patchwork exceptions to this – with some loans for as much as $729,250 authorized in very expensive markets – in legislation passed earlier this year.

Those emergency limits are set to expire at the end of the year.

“This legislation is good news for both the markets and homeowners,” said Dodd. “The bill addresses the root of our current economic problems – the foreclosure crisis – by creating a voluntary initiative at no estimated cost to taxpayers which will help Americans keep their homes.

The bill also establishes a new fund that will help create more affordable housing for millions for Americans.

Finally, this legislation takes a balanced approach toward reforming the GSEs, creating a world class regulator with enough authority to help these vital institutions operate in a safe and sound manner, while better fulfilling their important mission of providing affordable housing for Americans.”

Senator Shelby, a strong proponent of GSE reform, said, “In my judgment, the new GSE regulator created under this legislation would be granted much needed authority and flexibility to regulate the GSEs appropriately.

Ultimately, a strong regulator will better serve the interests of homeowners and taxpayers for years to come. I’m also pleased that the Hope for Homeowners proposal is paid for. I’ve long said that we should do what we can to help struggling homeowners, short of asking the taxpayer to foot the bill”.

——————————————————–
Story Information

Title: Senate Nears Accord on its Version of Housing Rescue Bill
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:54:45 EST


_uacct = “UA-4394842-1″;
urchinTracker();

American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act

Filed under: News: 5-07-2008 American Housing and Foreclosure Rescue — gloriaboone @ 5:22 pm

Housing: Rescue and Foreclosure
Wednesday, May 07, 2008 -

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House this week will consider the American Housing Rescue and Floreclosure Prevention Act. This bill will amend the Senate-passed H.R. 3221 (As amended by the Senate).

Everyone—homeowners, lenders, neighborhoods, indeed our entire economy is worse off when a foreclosure occurs and when significant quantities of homes are foreclosed in a short amount of time. Modernizing the FHA and reforming the GSEs will provide crucial liquidity to our mortgage markets now, and also strengthen regulation and oversight for the future. These measures, which have bipartisan support, will begin to repair the economy, restore confidence in the markets, limit the damage to families and neighborhoods, and help build new affordable housing.

Amendment 1

Title I – The FHA Housing Stabilization and Homeownership Retention Act.

Creates a voluntary FHA program to provide mortgage refinancing assistance to allow families to stay in their homes, protect neighborhoods, and help stabilize the housing market.
Program. If the current lender agrees to take a substantial writedown on the existing mortgage, the FHA lender will pay off the current lender and issue to the borrower a new FHA-insured mortgage at that lower amount.

Profit Sharing. To help defray the government’s costs and prevent unjust enrichment (e.g., borrower flipping), will require the borrower to share with the government a substantial portion of any profits from selling or refinancing the house.

No Speculators. Only owner-occupied primary residences will qualify for the program, which also contains protections to exclude persons who have committed mortgage fraud.
Risk Reduction. To further protect the government:

the FHA will charge higher fees to build up a loss reserve;

the new FHA loan will substantially reduce the borrower’s monthly payments, thus reducing default and foreclosure risk; and

in addition to other underwriting requirements, riskier borrowers must make at least 6 months of payments at the new rate before closing on the new FHA mortgage.

Sunset. Program expires in 2 years (with possible 6-month extensions not to exceed 2 years).
Additional Provisions. Creates an Office of Housing Counseling within HUD and authorizes additional FBI and DOJ funds to combat mortgage fraud.

Title II – FHA Modernization

Loan Limits. Makes permanent the temporary FHA loan limit increases in the economic stimulus bill, setting FHA limits at the lower of (a) 125% of the local area median home price, or (b) 175% of the nationwide GSE conforming limit.

Fee Protections for lower income and lower credit borrowers. Directs HUD to serve borrowers with slightly higher credit risk, raises fees to cover the additional risk, and provides for a refund if borrower makes five years of on-time payments

Reverse Mortgages. Expands FHA reverse mortgage loan program by authorizing a nationwide loan limit equal to 132% of the current GSE conforming loan limit; capping and reducing loan origination fees; and adding consumer protections.

FHA Personal Property Manufactured Home Loans. Modernizes and rejuvenates the FHA manufactured loan program for personal property manufactured homes.

FHA Condo and Manufactured Home Loans. Makes changes to rules to make these loans more flexible, while retaining basic underwriting protections.

Maximum FHA Loan Term. Extends the maximum FHA term from 35 to 40 years

Integrity of Appraisals. Strengthens protections against inflated appraisals, authorizing penalties on parties to FHA loans who improperly try to influence appraisal values

Borrowers Lacking Sufficient Credit History. Creates a pilot program for credit-worthy borrowers that lack a credit history through the normal credit reporting process.

Down Payment Simplification. Simplifies the basic FHA down payment calculation, while generally preserving the current FHA loan to value (LTV) levels.

Foreclosed FHA Multifamily Properties. Preserves the affordability of such properties, by requiring FHA to use accurate appraisals reflecting the cost of rehabilitating the units

Title III – Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Reform. Includes the House-passed bill to reform prudential and mission oversight of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks (the “GSEs”).

Strong Independent Regulator. Brings GSEs under a single independent regulator with broad safety and soundness powers, including conservatorship and receivership authority.

Enhanced Housing Mission. Enhances Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s housing mission through improvements in targeting of their affordable housing goals and duties in underserved markets.

New Affordable Housing Fund. Establishes a new affordable housing fund modeled on the Affordable Housing Programs of the Federal Home Loan Banks.

Increased Loan Limits. Makes permanent the increases in conforming loan limits included in the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. Limits in high cost areas would be set based on area, rather than national prices, with conforming loan limits for each area set at 125% of the local area median (capped at 175% of the national median).

Title IV – Castle/Kanjorski Facilitation of Loan Modifications. HR 5579, The Emergency Loan Modification Act of 2008, adopted by the Financial Services Committee on April 23, 2008

Provides clarity for servicers, consistent with existing servicing contracts, about their duties when making loan modifications for troubled mortgages.

Provides protection from investor lawsuits to servicers who make specified long-term loan modifications.

Intended to encourage the use of loan modifications to keep families in their homes.

Does not limit other loss mitigation efforts by servicers, and does not prevent borrowers from pursuing claims against lenders, services, or others involved in the mortgage process.

Title V – Miscellaneous Housing Provisions

Protecting Disabled Veterans in Bankruptcy from Discrimination. Ensures that a governmental unit that has a mortgage loan program may not deny a disabled veteran the benefits of such program because the veteran is or was a bankruptcy debtor.

The Bankruptcy Code currently prohibits various forms of discrimination against bankruptcy debtors by governmental units and others, including a denial of a student grant, loan, loan guarantee, or loan insurance to someone because he or she is or was a bankruptcy debtor.

Public Welfare Investments.

The bill broadens the types of permissible public welfare investments for national and state member banks, restoring the pre-2006 standard for eligible types of affordable housing and community and economic development investments. It also grants thrifts similar authority to make public welfare investments of up to 15 percent of their capital and surplus.

Starrett City Housing Development.

The provision would help maintain affordability at Starrett City, a 5,880 unit development in East New York. It would convert the Section 8 and RAP contracts to a project-based section 8 contract, allowing the owners to get higher rents while protecting tenants from paying higher rents or being displaced.

Housing Preservation. Rep. Markey –

Makes certain low-income tenants of the Heritage Apartments in Malden, Massachusetts eligible for enhanced housing vouchers after prepayment of a HUD mortgage and subsequent ownership transfer of the property. Rep. Pryce – Allows for the transfer of Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment contracts in Columbus, Ohio.

Title VI – The Housing Assistance Authorization Act

Authorizes funds for the National Urban League, the LaRaza Development Fund, the Housing Partnership Network and the National Community Renaissance Program ($5 million each in 2008 and $10 million in 2009 and 2010) for technical and financial assistance for community and affordable housing development, serving low- and moderate income households.

Amendment 2

Brad Miller-LaTourette Amendment

Affirms the right of states to prevent abusive foreclosure practices and to establish rules concerning the foreclosure process by clarifying that this Act, the National Bank Act and the Home Owner’s Loan Act do not preempt state laws regulating the foreclosure of residential real property or the treatment of foreclosed property.



Related Articles :

MBA Hails Veto Threat on Senate Housing Bill David G. Kittle, Chairman-elect of the Mortgage Bankers Association, issued the following statement applauding the Bush Administration’s Statement of Administration Policy strongly opposing S. 2636, the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008:

White House Will Veto Housing BillThe White House promised to veto a housing bill that key industry groups believe would create even more havoc in an already troubled industry.

Senate Moves Forward on Controversial Housing BillThe U.S. Senate announced it was moving forward on a controversial housing bill that industry groups believe would lead to stricter lending standards and higher interest rates.

House Passes American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention ActThe U.S. House of Representatives passed the most comprehensive response yet to the American mortgage crisis. The American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act (H.R. 3221) responds directly to the current crisis facing middle class Americans while providing the tools to prevent a repeat of these problems.

House Passes The Neighborhood Stabilization Act By a vote of 239-188, the House passed The Neighborhood Stabilization Act (H.R. 5818), which authorizes a $15 billion federal grant and loan program to help state and local governments purchase, rehabilitate, and resell or rent foreclosed homes.

May 19, 2008

Dispelling the Ever-Present Myths of Reverse Mortgages

Filed under: News: Dispelling the Ever-Present Myths of Reverse Mort — gloriaboone @ 11:43 am


To all:

I am always scouring financial news, mortgage reports, senior citizen need articles to bring the best, and most updated information to this blog. To encourage seniors who can make good use of a reverse mortgage, and to ward off others, who may benefit from other financial solutions.

Today I saw the following article from the business section of the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, and thought it would be good to share the best of it with you.

Some of these myths, such as the bank taking a seniors home or selling it, actually go back over 25 years to the early days when reverse mortgages were small private loans. But since HUD/FHA and Congress made it a government regulated loan, senior homeowneres are protected from this.

Another ongoing myth is that adult children do not want their parents to “mortgage up” their inheritance. Actually, a review of the literature shows that most adult children want their parents to be independent as long as possible, enjoy their retirement years and use their assets for their own enjoyment, or to defray any heavy health care costs.

Stay tuned to this website for more information regarding the uses and dynamics of parents-adult children and reverse mortgages.

I hope you find today’s article helpful and informative.

And, enjoy today to the fullest!

Gloria


BUSINESS FOCUS
Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
Monday, May 19, 2008
Story last updated at 5/19/2008 – 1:58 am
05/19/08

As reverse mortgages have increased in popularity, so have the myths about these unique loans. While there’s better information available today, many seniors and their adult children who are exploring reverse mortgages still encounter a host of misconceptions. Here’s a look at common myths and the facts:

1. The bank takes the house or the borrower can lose the house.

With a reverse mortgage, the borrower retains title throughout the life of thereverse mortgage. The borrower cannot, as a result of the reverse mortgage, be
forced out of the home as long as property taxes and insurance are paid and the
home is maintained in reasonable living condition. Once the borrower permanently
moves out of the home, the loan must be repaid. Most properties secured by
reverse mortgages still have equity when a maturity event occurs; the borrower
or heirs can opt to sell the home to repay the loan and preserve this equity for
the benefit of the borrower or his/her estate.

2. The home must be paid off or be debt-free to qualify.

Reverse mortgages convert home equity into cash. As long as there is sufficient
equity in the property, the homeowner may be eligible for a reverse mortgage. In
fact, many seniors use a reverse mortgage to pay off an existing mortgage in
order to eliminate a required monthly mortgage payment.


3. When a reverse mortgage becomes due, the bank sells the home.

The borrower is in control of the home and retains title, not the bank or
lender. While it’s common for the borrower or heirs to sell the home to repay
the loan, it’s a decision they make. They might instead refinance the home to
repay the loan.

4. It’s cheaper to move to a smaller house.

Seniors need to analyze their costs carefully before making this assumption.
Selling a home and moving can be expensive. The typical real estate commission
of 6 percent, combined with moving expenses, can make finding a new home a
serious financial undertaking.

5. Children want the home or don’t feel comfortable with their parents obtaining a reverse mortgage.

Seniors should talk with their family about reverse mortgages. Often adult
children are pleased their parents have a financial solution available to help
them live more independently and financially secure.

6. The borrower could owe more than the house is worth.

Due to built-in safeguards, the borrower or his estate can never owe more than
the value of the home upon repayment. In addition, the HECM product are insured
by the Federal Housing Administration.

7. Reverse mortgage processes will impact Social Security and Medicare benefits.

Generally, a reverse mortgage will not affect regular Social Security payments
or Medicare benefits, although some Federal Supplemental Security Income of
state programs may be impacted. Borrowers should speak with a financial advisor
or the appropriate agencies.

8. There are restrictions on how the money is used.

Actually, there are no restrictions, and proceeds from the reverse mortgage can
be used for any purpose – travel, to pay off debt, make purchases or just live
more comfortably.

9. Once proceeds are received, taxes will need to be paid.

Since the proceeds are already the borrower’s money, they are tax-free*.

10. Reverse mortgages are only for seniors in need or for the “house rich, cash poor.”

Reverse mortgages are excellent financial planning tools that have been used by
homeowners for all walks of life to enhance their retirement years.

Burl D. Greaves is a Reverse Mortgage Specialist for Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation.

*Consult your tax advisor.


Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.